top of page

Criminal Justice Support

Being 'FASD Responsive'TM  in the  Criminal Justice System

1. Logic cannot be expected from a person with FASD during a crisis. NEVER ASK WHY the person did or is doing something. The person may have no idea. A person with FASD is prone to both impulsivity and a lack of personal insight.

​

2. Remember that recollections of the exact sequencing of an event will likely never be consistent or match the actual sequence of what happened. The sequence could be all mixed up because individuals with FASD has brain damage where they have trouble with memory.

 

Further, abstract concepts of time and money can also big stumbling blocks for those with FASD. The answers given to the same questions may be different even in the space of a minute.

​

3. When possible, communications should be conducted in a quiet and safe environment. Surrounding a person with FASD with several law enforcement officers and rapidly asking questions is a recipe for disaster.

 

One-on-one interpersonal interactions are preferable. The professional should act quietly and calmly, without any emotion.

 

Those with FASD are highly influenced by the emotional atmosphere around them. Any frustration or intense emotion on the law enforcement officer’s part will be absorbed and magnified back by the person with FASD.

​

4. Individuals with FASD are highly suggestible; take advise from an FASD Informed professional

​

5. Professionals should be sure to help a person with FASD orient to the situation. This should include clearly explaining what is happening at each step during the process. The use of clear, simple, and short sentences can be incredibly beneficial.

 

The professional should continue to reassure the person with FASD and let him or her know that he or she is safe. Professionals should help minimise the risk of catastrophising.

​

6. Always ask a person with FASD how to contact his or her “safe person.” Be sure to give individuals the opportunity to communicate with their safe person. Check system or NHS file for name of carer or parent or if carrying FASD Card with safe persons details. 

​

7. People with FASD often struggle to understand another person’s intent. As such, law enforcement officers should slow down conversations and use straightforward language that can encourage comprehension.

 

What may appear to be blatant disobedience could just be an example of the person’s inability to understand and follow directions.

 

  • When possible, call the person by name to get his or her attention.

 

  • Speak in short slow sentences. ​

 

  • Wait around 20 seconds for a response.

 

  • If you need to repeat say the same sentence in the same way.

 

  • The law enforcement officer may need to repeat something several times but you must wait at least 20 seconds for them to process the answer. 

​

Mental Capacity?

Assessing capacity of someone with FASD by an approved 'FASD Informed' Professional is vital... why?

​

​There are certain decisions an individual can only agree to if they have mental capacity. Other decisions can only be made on someone’s behalf if they are assessed as lacking mental capacity.

 

It is often confusing to work out whether someone has mental capacity. The MCA applies to people aged 16 and over.

 

The MCA starts with the assumption that everyone has mental capacity and if an individual is struggling, then they should be helped to make their own decision rather than have the decision made for them.

 

Making an unwise decision doesn't mean someone lacks capacity. Under the MCA, a person lacks mental capacity if they cannot do 1 or more of the following:

 

• understand the information relevant to the decision

• retain that information for long enough to make the decision

• use or weigh up that information as part of the process of making the decision • communicate their decision in any way

 

Even if someone is deemed to lack full capacity, those making decisions on their behalf must act in their best interests, and their wishes, aspirations and views should be considered and included in any best interests meeting.

​

Who carries out assessments under the Mental Capacity Act?

 

The Act is designed to empower those in health and social care to assess mental capacity themselves, rather than rely on expert assessments by psychiatrists or psychologists.

 

Although, in cases involving complex or major decisions, a professional opinion from a GP, a consultant psychiatrist or psychologist is often appropriate.

 

All assessors should consider the Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice (the Code) and the NICE Guidelines On Decision Making And Mental Capacity (the Guidelines).

 

4.51 of the Code states that if the person has a particular condition or disorder, it may be appropriate to contact a specialist (for example, consultant psychiatrist, psychologist or other professional with experience of caring for patients with that condition).

 

Contact your local FASD Alliance for details of FASD trained clinicians local to you.

 

Assessments of capacity are time and decision-specific. So, a person may lack capacity in one area, like managing finances but have capacity in other areas. This means that different people will be involved in assessing someone’s capacity to make different decisions at different times.

 

If there is a disagreement, the Court of Protection will decide whether a person has mental capacity and the person who is challenging the assessment can apply directly to the Court of Protection by submitting expert evidence using a COP3 Form.

 

You do not need a solicitor, but you may want to seek legal guidance. Capacity and needs assessments for individuals with FASD as your young adult transitions into adulthood there may be various assessments of need and capacity.

 

This may be a formal transition assessment or a mental capacity assessment for an LPA, or it could be what seems like an informal ‘chat’ by social services for supported living.

 

Often, these capacity assessments and needs assessments are carried out by social service safeguarding teams, the police, government agencies (such as the DWP), and even professionals, (such as GPs) who have no, or very little understanding of FASD.

 

Assessors often do not have the skills or experience or knowledge to dig deeper to recognise that abilities are often superficial, and as a result may not accurately assess capacity, especially if your young adult is articulate and comes across as capable. For example, your teenager may be able to physically cook, clean, wash, book an appointment, self-medicate, but ONLY by being adult led and supervised and when being engaged.

​

Lived-experience shows that the ’hidden’ nature of FASD can sometimes lead to significant risk to individuals with FASD as the ‘experts’ deem a teenager with FASD to have capacity in situations where they may not.

 

The individual may be left in a vulnerable situation without the support they need and the carers may be accused of being overbearing. Those who carry out capacity and needs assessments on individuals with FASD should have specific training to understand the nuances of the disorder and interpret behaviours accurately.

 

You should refer the assessor to your local FASD UK Alliance organisation for input if they are not appropriately trained in FASD and they need support.

 

Deprivation of Liberty

 

The liberty of an adult aged 18 and over can only be taken away in very specific situations.

 

The MCA calls this a ’deprivation of liberty’. Being deprived of liberty means that someone is prevented from doing anything without continuous supervision. A deprivation of liberty should only be used if it’s the least restrictive way of keeping someone safe.

 

If an individual aged 18 and over is in a hospital or care home, liberty can normally only be taken away if health professionals use the procedures called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which provide a legal framework to balance the need for care and treatment with the fundamental right to freedom and autonomy.

 

If an individual is aged 16 or over, lives at home, in supported accommodation or in a shared lives placement it is only the Court of Protection who can decide to deprive someone of their liberty. The Court will appoint deputies to act on the individual’s behalf if they are unable to make decisions about personal health, finance or welfare.

​

Written by Velma Eyre. This fact sheet is for information only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. (May 2025)

For more information please see more details HERE

bottom of page